Friday, December 09, 2005

Times slams Corzine's choice

Today at 2PM, Gov.-Elect Jon Corzine is purported to be naming Rep. Robert Menendez to fill the vacant Senate seat. In this morning's Times of Trenton (which had come out in support of Rep. Rush Holt for the seat,) the editorial "Corzine plays it safe" strongly disagrees with this choice:

With his reported choice of Rep. Bob Menendez, D-Union City, to fill the remaining year of his U.S. Senate term, Gov.-elect Jon Corzine has taken the politically safe course.
It's a disappointing selection, however. The governor-elect could have struck a blow for statesmanship and independent thinking in public office by naming Rep. Rush Holt, D-Hopewell Township, to succeed him in the upper house of Congress. But that obviously wasn't his primary consideration.
They suggest the $4.1 war chest Menendez has amassed, the pressure from political bosses and the overwhelming suport of Hispanic groups were among the reasons for the selection.

There are bunches of blog posts pro and con about Menendez so I won't attempt a full discussion here. There is an issue here that upsets me greatly with Menendez, however:

As a U.S. senator, Jon Corzine has courageously stood with the defenders of the Bill of Rights in opposing a constitutional amendment to overturn the Supreme Court ruling that burning the American flag as a gesture of protest is symbolic speech and can't be prohibited by law. Last summer, that amendment received the two-thirds vote required for passage in the House of Representatives, with Rep. Menendez voting in favor (and Rep. Holt against). Now it stands ready for action by the Senate, where its advocates already count 65 senators - two short of two-thirds, if all 100 senators vote - on their side.
When the Senate acts next year, the newly appointed Sen. Menendez's "aye" will be the 66th vote in favor of this frivolous and harmful amendment. It could be the vote that will send it to the states for ratification if only one anti-amendment senator fails to show up and take part. Obviously, that consideration wasn't a deal-breaker for Gov.-elect Corzine. But it's an indicator of how much he's willing to put at risk to placate a powerful political pressure group.
And the Republicans jump for joy...

(cross-posted on


DBK said...

Terrible decision. It's a slap in the face of Democrats who trusted him to do the right thing. I'm a little upset about this one. I still have some faith in Corzine, but it has been shaken by this concession to politics as usual. I was hoping he would start off brave and progressive.

Sluggo said...

I wouldn't say, joy, exactly. But that money counts. We've seen how much it counts (on both sides) in getting to the top in this state.

That aside, Holt would have been a stronger candidate for you next year.

Blogenfreude said...

who do you think the Repugs will put up?

And please join us in our newest fight: The War Against The War on Dunkin Donuts.